Archive for August, 2006


Jeg forstÃ¥r ikke…

Even from when I first showed up in Denmark, I could understand written Danish. Most of the words have cognates in English or French. Or you can just figure it out from context. Danish is very easy to read. Easy to learn, then, right?

Hahahahahahahahahaha.

Here’s a basic sentence in Danish:

Hej! Jeg hedder Karen og jeg bor på folkehøjskole i Ullerød.

Care to guess how one would pronounce that? Here’s a phoneticization:

Hi! Ya hilleh Karen oh ya bo‘uh poe foe-kuh-hoy-skole ee Ool-lih-rhole.

That’s a really crappy phoneticization–there’s a lot of vowel intonations and glottal stops that I can’t even pronounce, let alone type. It doesn’t capture the accent at all. But maybe it illustrates to you how FRICKING INSANE Danish spelling is. I count at least five dropped consonants, one *extra* vowel, and two d’s magically transformed into l’s for God knows what reason. (They’re called “soft” d’s. Bullcrap, I say.) And, as far as I can tell thus far, there really aren’t any rules in Danish for when to mangle the pronounciation and when to leave it alone (relatively speaking). You just have to know.

Apparently the pronounciation has drifted so far from the written Danish that even young Danes have trouble with it. They get tired of their own language and speak English instead!

I’m not worried about Danish *class*. None of my classmates are doing any better with pronounciation. I’ll do fine. The problem is that I pass for a Dane on the street or on the train unless I speak first. People immediately default to Danish when addressing me. I can hardly understand my classmates’ Danish–let alone a native’s! It feels so awkward–how does one gracefully tell a stranger, “Um, I’m an American, I have no idea what you just said…”? And I feel a little guilty, too, for being unable to follow the native language–considering many Americans’ attitude toward non-English-speaking residents (“Speak English or get out! Grawr!”), I feel like I have an obligation to understand Danish.

Ankomst

I’ve never been able to sleep on planes. I zone out, I close my eyes, my head falls forward–and I jerk up, awake. Something about the cramped quarters, I think. I’ve had real sleep in cars, on buses, on trains–just not planes.

But, I thought, maybe this time would be different. I’d gotten only two hours’ sleep the night before and none during the day. The flight would be dark, stretching from 5:30 PM EST to 7:30 AM CEST. Surely I would slumber for at least part of those 8 hours!

Ha ha. No.

About half of the people on the plane were DISers. Hyped up about their upcoming semester and meeting fellow students, they chatted for about the first few hours of the flight. Then there were the two movies–”Take the Lead” (so-so, Mad Hot Ballroom was the same topic only far cuter) and “Mean Girls” (an actually good movie? On a plane? Say it ain’t so!).

And even as the plane finally quieted down in the last three hours or so of the flight, my airborne insomnia, annoyingly, proved stronger than my sleep dep. I remember looking over across the aisle at an older man snoring lightly, empty vodka bottle on his tray table. I suddenly realized why they serve those overpriced drinks on flights.

Maybe I’ll try that next time.

I ended up going about 50 hours with only two hours of sleep. Ironically, though, while this made my first day hell, I think it reset my system such that later I haven’t had much jet lag.

Anyway. As dawn broke outside the plane, I was exhausted, dehydrated (damn the DHS), missing Nelson, and feeling mildly nauseous from the few bites of airplane food I’d attempted. I looked down on the endless grey nimbostratus and wondered if this trip wasn’t a big mistake.

But then we broke through the clouds. I realized I was looking down at the ocean, grey-blue and calm, with flat grey-green islands peeking through the fog. The plane raced over the beach toward the runway, overpassing adorable green and gold farms with freshly-painted red houses and spotted cows. In that moment, for the first time, I was really, truly excited about being here.

This is what is known as the honeymoon phase of study abroad. We’ll see whether or not it lasts. For now, though, I am in love with beautiful Denmark.

Photography

It’s photography
What’re you supposed to say?
What’re you supposed to do?

Kevin Fleming

What can I say? I like pretty things.

The photographer is a guy named Eric whom I met at the Free Culture conference last spring. You should most definitely check out his photos. Much prettiness.

“Every time Bruce Schneier writes a fully general halt-checker, God kills a passenger pigeon. This is why passenger pigeons are extinct.”

Bruce Schneier facts. Like Chuck Norris facts, only better.

This, of course, is Schneier’s actual site. Less humorous, perhaps, but a great read.

On a somewhat related note, an interesting discussion of the feasibility of the liquid explosives plot, by a chemistry student. Read and think.

Adium blues

Adium is behaving very strangely for me. It’s made my AIM account effectively useless. Sometime this afternoon, it started logging out of my AIM account, then immediately logging back in, ad infinitum until the AIM network gave my account a time-out for logging in too much. I’ve waited until the 5 minutes were up, then manually logged into AIM, and it does the same. Shut down Adium, restarted–same deal. The AIM network itself seems to be just fine–my buddy list always pops up for the moment before it logs off again–so what in Adium could have changed to make it break this way?

Does anyone else see this problem, or have a way to fix it?

Andiamo!

In anticipation for my semester abroad, I’ve been researching travel in Europe. I’ll be visiting Sweden and Germany in September as part of an all-school weekend trip, and there are day trips to various places in Denmark throughout the semester. The big travel opportunity, however, will be the three week mid-semester break from October 14 to November 5.

The first week I will be spending with the politics department traveling to Amsterdam, Brussels, and the Hague. During the second and third weeks two optional “adventure trips” are offered–one to Scotland, one to the Czech Republic–neither of which particularly captures my interest. I’m not that into whiskey or haggis (though the kayaking’d be fun). The Czech one actually looks rather awesome, but I’m pretty bad at rock climbing and spelunking…

So. Two weeks. Where to go?

The obvious candidate is France, of course. I’ve never visited a Francophone country before (except Montreal, which only kind of counts). About time I got to exercise what’s left of my high school French. I’d want to do the tourist thing in Paris, sure, but I also want to visit southern France and the Loire valley, if possible. Taste some wine, eat some bread, and explore. A possible side trek here could be to spend a day in London, taking the train from Paris. But that would be a separate ticket–the UK isn’t part of the whole Eurail pass deal–and as the Eurostar site is currently broken I can’t say how much it would cost.

Ever since I read Bloomability (still one of my favorite books… shut up), I’ve had a ridiculous crush on Switzerland. I mean, how can you not love a peaceable, neutral, tri-lingual nation that makes the best chocolate in the world? Lugano sounds positively gorgeous (palm trees! and skiing!), as does Montreaux from my dad’s stories (“Smoke On the Water”!). I’m doubtful that skiing in Switzerland would be within my budget (or even all that possible in October), but that’s alright with me. And they have a “Chocolate Train”! Really!

I’m thinking about Italy, too. It’s right by Lugano, and by all reports a gorgeous country. But I kinda want to avoid cramming in too much. With the train passes, the real expense is not in the number of countries but the number of travel days and I’m not sure if I’d see everything I wanted in all three countries with just five stops. If I’m gonna go to Italy, I don’t want to just visit one city.

But I don’t know. Hopefully I’ll meet people on the program to travel with who are up for visiting Switzerland and such. Or not, and I’ll go have crazy adventures in Austria or somewhere. It’s all good.

I have a digital camera!

Today I (well, my dad, but I’m paying him back as soon as my bank account gets unlocked) bought my first digital camera, for the purpose of recording my sojourns in Denmark in two weeks. I am severely excited. Here’s the first picture I took with it. Jenny!

It’s a 5.0 MP Panasonic with 256 MB of flash memory–should be enough, since I nearly always have Zachary around to offload photos. I chose it largely because it has good image stabilization and also because I was already familiar with the user interface, since Nelson’s camera is of the same brand.

Operating on the principle that I take better care of things (or at least lose them less often) when they’re anthropomorphized, I am taking suggestions for names for my shiny metallic baby. Ideas?

In other news, I have been doing an utterly ridiculous amount of shopping with Mom and my sister in the last two days. I suppose it’s justified–I haven’t bought any cold-weather clothing in several years, since I’ve spent the majority of my winters in California at school–but it still seems excessive. A scarlet poncho, a wine-colored short-sleeved sweater, a nice pleated black skirt, a brown tunic/sweater/thingamabob, a white tank top, and a pair of jeans that will hopefully NOT develop five holes in the crotchal region within three months *ahem*. Remaining on the list is a good raincoat and various non-clothing supplies, but I think I’m set sweaterwise.

Finally, that new Red Hot Chili Peppers song is relentlessly stuck in my head. Good, but argh!

So I’m sure y’all have heard of the latest airport security hullabaloo–the British government foiled a potential terrorist plot and arrested some 21 people. And then decided that having done this, the public was LESS, not more, secure (??), and banned all carry-ons except for some very specific items:

* Pocket size wallets and pocket size purses plus contents (for example money, credit cards, identity cards etc (not handbags);

* Travel documents essential for the journey (for example passports and travel tickets);

* Prescription medicines and medical items sufficient and essential for the flight (e.g. diabetic kit), except in liquid form unless verified as authentic;

* Spectacles and sunglasses, without cases;

* Contact lens holders, without bottles of solution;

* For those traveling with an infant: baby food, milk (the contents of each bottle must be tasted by the accompanying passenger);

* Sanitary items sufficient and essential for the flight (nappies, wipes, creams and nappy disposal bags);

* Female sanitary items sufficient and essential for the flight, if unboxed (e.g. tampons, pads, towels and wipes) tissues (unboxed) and/or handkerchiefs;

* Keys (but no electrical key fobs)

(all of the above must be in a clear plastic bag)

So far, American officials have not taken such draconian measures. Instead, they are making passengers throw out all their toothpaste, lip gloss, and Starbucks in the name of National Securityâ„¢. There have been no reports yet of any exploding trash cans at checkpoints, but one must question the wisdom of *intentionally mixing* a whole buttload of potentially explosive liquids in the middle of a crowded security line… My Nalgene and I are grateful that I flew yesterday.

There are rumors, however, that the TSA may extend its restrictions to be as recockulous as the Brits’. All I can say is that, if extended, these measures had better be short-term (read: a week or less) and in response to a very specific threat (like, if they know that members of the plot are still active, at large, and planning to carry out the attack imminently). Other than that, it’s simply not worth it. To paraphrase Cory Doctorow, even if they strapped down, stripped naked, and tranquilized air passengers, one cannot underestimate the amount of semtex and roofing nails a dedicated man can hide in his colon. The point is–we will never be 100% safe. Giving up our liberties in pursuit of an unattainable goal is stupid. Beyond a certain point, the trade-off isn’t worth it. A mature, level-headed “home of the brave” (and its government) would recognize those simple, simple facts and SUCK IT UP. But, alas, the Bush administration is neither Churchill nor FDR.

I don’t trust the people who search checked luggage with my Zachary. They steal things and the administrative procedures for getting reimbursed are terrible. I sure as hell am NOT getting on a eight hour long transatlantic flight without at least a goddamn book. If carry-on items were a reasonable security trade-off yesterday, they should be a reasonable security trade-off now–short of a very specific, short-term reason to think otherwise. They can take my carry-on luggage from my cold dead fingers, dammit.

Short, FYI version:

My cell phone is borked, so if you call me I may or may not be able to answer (haven’t tried yet), but I definitely can’t make calls out.

Long, ranty version:

After picking out new glasses frames, my mom, sister, and I went out to lunch at Camille’s–which has tasty food and the best color scheme I’ve ever seen in a restaurant. Five minutes after we left, I realized I didn’t have my purse. I knew I’d had it at the restaurant (I’d checked for my health insurance card while we were there), so we went back to look for it. The ladies now sitting at our booth hadn’t seen it; neither had the workers there. I left my number with the manager, in shock that it had disappeared so quickly.

Contents of my purse:
Wallet (with debit card, driver’s license, health insurance card, and around $60 in cash)
Two paychecks I had been going to deposit today (since there are no Wells Fargos on the East Coast) — total value $1700
Checkbook
Cell phone
Sunglasses (prescription)

As you can probably imagine, I was a very unhappy camper. Indeed, I was a very foul-mouthed camper who wanted to go take a baseball bat to something or someone. I called Wells Fargo and put a hold on my bank account. Mom called my dad and had him suspend my cell phone number. Then I had to go to a doctor’s appointment for a physical.

My mom was late picking me up from the doctor’s, but she had good reason. She had gone back to Camille’s a second time–by which time the workers there had found my purse! She didn’t even ask where. Much relief ensued.

I still have to wait for my new bank account to get set up and new checks and cards and whatnot to be issued “in 7-10 days”. And I still can’t use my cell phone–though hopefully that can be easily reversed. But that is MUCH preferable to the alternative.

GBU

The Good:

This made me laugh so hard I cried. I’m not quite sure why. It might be the guy’s voice…the voice is just perfect.

Yay for Jeopardy consolation prizes! And throwing crap on the floor!

It’s a promotion for Bob Harris’ upcoming book “Prisoner of Trebekistan,” which strikes me as Dave Barry-esque, only nerdier and more cosmopolitan. I might have to read this one.

The Bad:

I know people have been hollering OMG BUSH = DICTATOR!&!$1! since like 2000, but…

Read the article. Basically, after the Supreme Court ruled that Bush’s Gitmo military tribunals were illegal, he had to come up with new ones. Which, to look at the leaked draft, are even worse than the originals–challenging the decision instead of respecting it.

New Features of Tribunals 2.0â„¢:

  • Expanded authority: Instead of focusing on Al-Qaeda, the new tribunals would apply to anyone “accused of joining or associating with terrorist groups engaged in anti-U.S. hostilities, and of committing or aiding hostile acts by such groups.”

  • Eviscerates due process rights even more thoroughly:

    Under the proposed procedures, defendants would lack rights to confront accusers, exclude hearsay accusations, or bar evidence obtained through rough or coercive interrogations. They would not be guaranteed a public or speedy trial and would lack the right to choose their military counsel, who in turn would not be guaranteed equal access to evidence held by prosecutors.

    Detainees would also not be guaranteed the right to be present at their own trials if their absence is deemed necessary to protect national security or individuals. …

    To secure a death penalty under the draft legislation, at least five jurors must agree, two fewer than under the administration’s earlier plan. Courts-martial and federal civilian trials require that 12 jurors agree.

  • The Incredible Expanding Junta: The scope of the military tribunals could be expanded at any time by the Secretary of State.

What this means:

John D. Hutson, the Navy’s top uniformed lawyer from 1997 to 2000, said the rules would evidently allow the government to tell a prisoner: “We know you’re guilty. We can’t tell you why, but there’s a guy, we can’t tell you who, who told us something. We can’t tell you what, but you’re guilty.”

…maybe I’ll just stay in Denmark…

(courtesy of Bob Harris’ blog)

The Ugly:

While I was visiting SWIL, I watched this Internet miniseries that was chock full of suspense, hilarious, and just plain well done. The name? “Puppet Rapist.”

Eeeek.

So good. But SO disturbing.

Creative Commons License
Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.
Powered by WordPress.
Theme NewRiver by Karen Rustad, based on Motion by 85ideas.