Latest Entries »

You can make them like you.

I’m gonna write a bit on a song I’ve always liked, but more so in the last several months: “You Can Make Him Like You” by the Hold Steady. Go listen, if you haven’t heard the song before.

The chorus is short and goes like this:

There’s always other boys, there’s always other boyfriends

There’s always other boys, and you can make them like you.

It might be a rather empowering thing to sing to a girl, or as a girl, if it weren’t for the rest of the song…

The song lists a bunch of things the girl doesn’t have to do for herself because her boyfriend does them for her: talk to dealers, know the way home, go to the right schools, and so on. It’s great, all the effort and annoyance that his presence spares her. “It only gets inconvenient” when she wants to do things by herself.

I like the song, but it makes me angry, too. Maybe I like it because it makes me angry, because it reminds me of lessons I had better not forget. The song reminds me too much of my relationship with N, at least in the early years. Minus the drug usage, it hits a little close to comfort. Especially this stanza:

You don’t have to know the inspiring people.

Let your boyfriend know the inspiring people.

You can hang in the kitchen,

Talk about the stars of the upcoming sequel.

When N and I got together, in the early days of my involvement with the free culture movement, I didn’t feel like I had the experience or expertise to have anything important to say. So I, fairly consciously, hid behind N, who seemed to know what he was doing. N was friends with all the cool people, the free culture warriors and scholars. I met them and admired them from a distance, but it didn’t even occur to me that I could or needed to become friends with them in my own right. So I didn’t. I have one or two friends today that I wouldn’t've had if I hadn’t been involved in SFC, and my free culture involvement let me do a few crazy things like visit Croatia, but I feel I wasted most of that opportunity.

I’ve never forgotten an evening towards the end of the first summer N and I spent together. L came over for dinner, bursting with ideas for rebooting SFC. I slipped into the kitchen to make dinner while he and N talked. When we were eating, L said that he was aware of how Marxists and other organizers would (intentionally or unintentionally) exclude women from the strategy and debates by fobbing scut work onto them and that he didn’t want that to happen here; he promised to do his share. By the end of the meal, though, he’d forgotten, and I washed the dishes while L and N planned and plotted.

I’m ashamed to say, I was mostly comfortable with that role. It was easy to justify—N was outgoing, I wasn’t, so of course he could take care of talking and networking and social organizing for the both of us. Just as I made up for his weaknesses in other areas. Being young, I couldn’t tell that our arrangement was codependent, not interdependent. It’s still difficult for me to tell the two apart.

For all of my time in free culture, and most of my time on the East Coast, I let myself be in the background. I let myself be just “N’s girl”. I didn’t push myself outside my comfort zone and try to connect with people I didn’t know well. I didn’t assert opinions that I wasn’t confident of. It was only later, when I had more confidence in my knowledge of the org and held passionately-held opinions to match, that it mattered that I was nothing but “N’s girl” to the rest of SFC. Then no one took me seriously.

Something that often keeps women in unbalanced or unhealthy relationships is the fear of being single. As the song goes, “They say you don’t have a problem, until you start sleeping alone.” But it’s clear—in the song and in life—that that’s not the real problem. Yes, women should be confident that they’ll have other partners; it’s generally the case. But the problem is unless something fundamental changes, they’ll let their new relationship be as unbalanced as their old one. A broken record; change without progress.

I do want to someday be with someone who knows what they want, who has their life mostly sorted, who has their own set of “inspiring people.” I want to date people who are impressive in one manner or another—who doesn’t? But what’s more important than that is I want to be one of those impressive, inspiring people in my own right. I have to promise myself that I will never again hide behind a boyfriend (or anyone else for that matter), never let someone make up for my weaknesses instead of working on them myself. It pisses me off to no end to think of how I shrank back in the past—all the *more* infuriating because of how comfortable and natural it felt to me at the time. That’s why the song makes me mad. It reminds me of how not-myself I let myself become. Whatever else I am, I am no shrinking violet.

I thought about grad school during my lunch break today and got extremely nervous. It’s not a feeling I’m used to; I’ve never had nerves about big events or impending school years or even the transition from high school to college. My course of study was always mostly the same liberal arts dreck, mostly things I was already good at, so I never doubted I would do well. But this fall in my graduate program, much of the curriculum will focus on things I’ve either never done before or have tried in the past and have found difficult. The part of the program I am already familiar with—information law and policy, from my time in the free culture movement—is explicitly what I do not want to concentrate in. Thus, my confidence in my success is much weaker than usual. So much, too, is riding on the next two years. I won’t have the financial wherewithal to fumble around any further and I’ll die before I ever live with my parents again. I *must* find a place for my career to seriously get started when this degree is complete. So, although it’s out of character, I worry.

I’m also starting this chapter in my life truly single and alone for the first time in four years. I’m completely free to determine my fate—and completely responsible for it. (But I repeat myself.) In three months I have to go do awesome things, meet awesome people, and find awesome projects, all on my own. I’m going to have to develop a mostly-new circle of friends, despite the fact that I hate talking to people I don’t know. The possibilities are endless, sure—and it scares me witless. It’s completely terrifying to be wholly responsible for your own life. There’s just no way around that existential truth. But I have promised myself to face up to it. I know now that dependence and bad faith are even worse. So I’ll have to do my best to live for myself as I try to live up to my eternally unrealistically perfectionist expectations.

And, sure, there may be other boys, but I sure as hell had better not make them like me. At least for now.

A common trope in comment threads across the Internet on articles about Facebook’s recent, myriad, astounding privacy fuck-ups is “Just don’t post anything on the Internet that you don’t want your employer or grandma to see. LOL DUUUUHH.” This isn’t terrible advice, but it completely misses the point.

There’s nothing on my Facebook profile that would be actually embarrassing or harmful if it became accessible by the public. But I keep my privacy settings as high as I can because I’m only interested in sharing that information with my friends. It wouldn’t be *terrible* if someone I wasn’t friends with saw it. I’m just not interested in sharing with marketeers or random Internet people. It’s none of their business. And that’s reason enough.

Take another security context. I’m not opposed to strip-searches or backscatter X-rays at the airport because I’m secretly hiding weapons or drugs. I’m opposed to them because my body is simply none of the TSA’s goddamn business. I’m opposed to unwanted exposure for its own sake, not because I’m fearful for the consequences of whatever’s exposed. And, again, that’s reason enough to be opposed.

Additionally, in the words of Cory Doctorow, “In any other context, making public something previously promised to remain private [as Facebook has done] is called ‘lying.’” Facebook has broken a promise made to its millions of users that they would empower them to control who saw their content. It’s broken its own freaking list of Principles for site governance. Facebook has lost its users’ trust; we have no faith in Mark Zuckerberg’s integrity or that of the rest of the company. It deserves to die.

The latest bit of hubbub in free culture world is a project called Diaspora, started by a couple NYU kids. They’re trying to make the StatusNet of social networks, replacing Facebook with an open-source, decentralized web app that you can run on your own server and which ties into existing services like Twitter and Flickr. Since Facebook is the Great Satan and doesn’t give a crap about its users’ privacy, yet network effects keep me trapped there, I’d kill for an interoperable, federated replacement.

Diaspora is raising money via Kickstarter, which will enable the four-person team to work on this full-time this summer. I encourage you to contribute. In the meantime, I hope they choose to release their code and find ways for the community to contribute in non-monetary ways as soon as possible.

For instance: Diaspora currently uses a picture of a dandelion as their ‘logo’. Nice photograph, but photo =/= logo. So I spent the afternoon futzing around with Photoshop and came up with this:

I emailed them it a few minutes ago, we’ll see if they like it or not.

A response to Cory Doctorow’s post on the iPad.

The reasons he lists are all reasonable reasons to not buy an iPad. Like Cory, I don’t need a computer-like appliance. That’s also why I don’t own an iPhone or a Wii or a Kindle. (Also, I’m poor.)

But just because *I* don’t need it doesn’t mean that I think it’s ethically dubious for someone else to. Yes, you’re opting into Apple’s walled garden. Yes, you’ll never be able to hack the device or install your own stuff on it or replace the battery yourself. But if you’re fine with all that, if your needs match what the iPad appliance offers, go ahead and purchase one. Especially if you already own a “real computer” (which is pretty likely, and something a lot of criticisms along these lines seem to miss). No one argues that purchasing a car with closed-source software embedded in it or a stylish, no-screws toaster is akin to investing in blood diamonds.

So why all the hate on the iPad? My guess is misplaced expectations. Critics expect a “real computer” and howl that it isn’t one. That’s frankly like whining about how the Eee PC sucks for running Photoshop. Those who want it and will buy it have different expectations.

Mandelbrot Set…

Mandelbrot Set, you’re a Rorschach test on fire

You’re a Day-Glo pterodactyl

You’re a heart-shaped box of springs and wire

You’re one badass fucking fractal

The above is the best quatrain, in my opinion, in Jonathan Coulton‘s ample music catalog. Thus, I made this:

and submitted it to TopatoCo’s Jonathan Coulton-themed t-shirt design contest. I would totally wear it. Hell, I’d make four shirts, one for each line of the chorus, if they’d let me. And wear ‘em all at once.

I noticed that the deadline for Doodle 4 Google, the drawing contest where schoolchildren redesign Google’s logo, was today. I’m far too old to compete in the contest, but it got me thinking of doodles I might have drawn if I could.

Then I came home from work and this happened:

Yeah, I’m going to hell. But with all the news lately of Google moving Google.cn to Hong Kong and withdrawing from China’s censorship rules, it was inevitable. If something along these lines hasn’t already been put together, by someone who sucks less at Photoshop than me, I would be very surprised…

Edit: Hm, there’s this graphic from a Wired article about Google’s withdrawal that’s sort of similar. More colorful, less simple.

Help Karen pick her next computer!

I’ve been planning to get a netbook / ultra-portable laptop for grad school. Today, my dad offered to buy me one in exchange for my weighty hunk of metal (aka late-model Powerbook) so that he can give it to my grandma who’s still, somehow, running one of these funky boys. So that means I need to figure out what kind of netbook to buy. All of my computers up to this point have been Macs, so I know very little about companies or selections in PC land. Hence this blog post!

What I’m looking for:

  • Runs Ubuntu without breaking. Ideally, I’d get something with Linux pre-installed to avoid the Microsoft tax, but wiping Windows isn’t a huge deal.
  • Has a keyboard that is pleasant to type on. I don’t want something super tiny or where the keys take an inordinate amount of force to push. The main point of this netbook is to take notes and other type-y activities.
  • The touchpad and mouse button are separate things. That one-surface button thing on the MacBooks drives me up the friggin’ wall.
  • 2 GB RAM.
  • Ideally, solid state drive instead of a hard drive. I REALLY don’t need much space on this thing, I’m not keeping my music on it. The cloud (or the USB stick) shall provide!
  • Doesn’t run excessively hot. I like the skin on my thighs unscalded, thanks.
  • Not too picky about processor speed. Again, this thing is for web browsing and typing. It should be able to play YouTube videos without melting, but I’m not going to be gaming or running Photoshop on this thing. That’s what my desktop is for. I also don’t really care if it has a webcam or not.
  • Reasonably lightweight, though I really don’t give a crap if it fits in a manila envelope or not.
  • Good battery life is a plus. Take 4 hours as a lower bound. Beyond 6-7 hours I really don’t care, I’m not going to be going that long without putting the damn thing to sleep or plugging it in.
  • Good wifi reception. 3G/etc is irrelevant, I can’t afford a data plan.
  • Reliable manufacturer with good customer support. I don’t want this thing to break for at least two years. And if it does happen to break during that time, I want to be able to get things cheerily fixed or replaced conveniently and for free.
  • < $500. Ideally, closer to $300.

Here’s some of the laptops I’ve found so far that are close to what I’m looking for:

  • The Asus Eee 1000 has (had?) the solid state drive, native Linux support, and most of the rest. Unfortunately, although it’s still up on Asus’ website, it doesn’t appear to be sold on any reputable site on the ‘net anymore. And the rest of the Eee line has Windows and friggin’ hard drives. What gives?
  • Now that I’ve been thoroughly let down, the rest of the 10″ Eee line isn’t so bad. The 1005HA is supposed to be pretty Ubuntu compatible, and I like the seashell design concept. I do wish they’d pare down the number of models—with their stupid broken Flash navigation comparing models is slow and excessively difficult. I also wish Asus actually sold the damn things, or gave you links where you could find particular models with particular combinations of options. The battery life is way more than I’ll ever need, and the prices I’ve seen are quite low. I’ve heard bad things about Asus’ customer support, though.
  • Then there’s the Starling from Linux-only hardware shop System76. Ubuntu out of the box, 2 GB RAM standard. 160 GB of hard drive space that I will never, ever, fill. Reasonably cute-looking, 2.6 lbs. Unsure how I feel about the mouse buttons on either side of the trackpad. The battery life isn’t spectacular–only about 4.5 hours according to this review. Even with the extra RAM, it’s hard to justify the price point next to the Eee PCs. I guess that’s what decent support costs?
  • The Lenovo Thinkpad X10e is a nice machine, with a larger monitor than everything else I’ve been considering. It’s not technically a netbook, but it weighs three pounds so close enough. The whole Thinkpad line is so ugly it’s almost charming—they’re just begging for some vinyl decorations or acrylic paint or something. I’ve also heard very good things about Lenovo’s support. But it seems oddly underpowered for the price, with only a 1.6GHz processor and 1 GB of RAM by default. Reviews have also said it runs really hot, with a loud fan besides.
  • Also from Lenovo is the Ideapad 10-3, which they actually promote as a netbook. Okay price point, has the new-ish Intel Atom 450 processor which is supposed to be good, and has been celebrated in reviews for its keyboard quality. Main flaws: 1.) It only comes with 1 GB RAM and and 2.) The trackpad and the mouse button are the same damn thing and that will drive me insane.

So those are the machines that I’m considering so far. But as I said before, I know very little of the world of netbooks, or PCs generally. Recommendations, please!

The future starts out so innocuously, but it gets creepier as you go along. Watch the whole thing.

Hat tip to Mike Tauraso, who doesn’t seem to have a website.

And my head told my heart, “Let love grow”

And my heart told my head, “This time, no”

–Mumford & Sons, “Winter Winds”

There was a New York Times article a year or so ago explaining recent scientific findings in the neurochemistry of love. By manipulating oxytocin receptors in the brains of female voles, scientists could make them pair bond for life—or be completely impervious to pair bonding. The article stuck in my head because the author was so interested in the latter finding, more so than the first. I found that odd. Our myths and stories are full of love potions. I couldn’t think of a single myth that featured a love vaccine. Yet it was that was what the author found interesting. That was what he wanted scientists to produce someday.

(I think this was the article.)

At the time, I couldn’t imagine why someone would want to give themselves a vaccine against love. It struck me as self-denying and unnatural as the company that erases memories in The Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. But now I wonder if the proper analogy would be to birth control—you’re deliberately, temporarily hindering a biological function until one is in a place in life when it makes sense to use that function.

So let’s assume that scientists were able to create a pill that could prevent romantic love in humans for as long as it was taken, like birth control pills. Let us also assume that it can isolate romantic bonding without affecting bonds of friendship or family—a non-trivial feat, but one I’ll assume possible for the sake of the question.

Would you consider taking the love control pill? Under what circumstances would you rationally consider romantic entanglements to be too complicated to be worth it? While employed as a dancer or sex worker? While studying for the bar? On tour with the band? During military service? During college? How about high school? Until your chosen career was solidly underway?

What are the things that you can get from romantic partners but not from friends and family? This list varies person-to-person, depending on both what they expect from romantic partners and what their circle of friends is capable of.

At what point in your life do you expect that list of things to be appropriate, useful, or necessary?

Earlier today I purchased a new T-square after I accidentally sat on the old one and, it being made out of cheap plastic, broke it. The new one is much larger than its predecessor and made out of aluminum. It felt like a melee weapon in my hand, so I tweeted to the effect that I kinda felt like I should be fighting zombies or something with it.

Well, instead of working on my webcomic, I spent the rest of the day drawing a thing, which I shall call “Associate Designer versus Zombie Army”:

A larger version of the drawing is now my computer desktop image. :)

Man, I wonder if anyone’s put together a Left 4 Dead scenario inside a graphic design studio…

Creative Commons License
Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.
Powered by WordPress.
Theme NewRiver by Karen Rustad, based on Motion by 85ideas.